Side-by-side technical and economic comparison between Anthropic's Claude Opus 5 and Anthropic's Claude Haiku 4.5.
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provider Organization | Anthropic | Anthropic | — |
| Standard Input / 1M | $5.00 | $1.00 | Claude Haiku 4.5 (80% lower) |
| Cached Input / 1M | $0.50 | $0.10 | Claude Haiku 4.5 lower |
| Output / 1M | $25.00 | $5.00 | Claude Haiku 4.5 lower |
| Context Window | 1M | 200k | Claude Opus 5 (1M) |
| Max Generation Tokens | 16.4k | 8.2k | Claude Opus 5 |
| Tokenizer Family | Anthropic Claude BPE (~65k vocabulary) | Anthropic Claude BPE (~65k vocabulary) | — |
| Workload (per month) | Claude Opus 5 | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Chatbot10k requests · 500 in / 200 out | $75.00 | $15.00 |
| RAG app100k requests · 8,000 in / 1,200 out | $7,000.00 | $1,400.00 |
| Coding agent100k requests · 12,000 in / 2,000 out | $11,000.00 | $2,200.00 |
Standard rates, no caching or batch discounts. Model your own numbers below.
Opt for Claude Opus 5 when your engineering requirements prioritize Anthropic's ecosystem, specific tokenizer efficiencies (Calibrated Claude Tokenizer (±3%)), or when your expected prompt-to-completion ratios favor its $5/M input rate.
Opt for Claude Haiku 4.5 when looking for Anthropic's tooling integration, specific context window depth (200k tokens), or when output generation volume favors its $5/M rate.
At a typical 3:1 input-to-output token mix, Claude Haiku 4.5 is about 80% cheaper than Claude Opus 5. Claude Opus 5 costs $5 per 1M input and $25 per 1M output tokens; Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1 and $5.
Claude Opus 5 has the larger context window: 1M tokens vs 200k.
Claude Opus 5: yes, cached input costs $0.5/1M. Claude Haiku 4.5: yes, cached input costs $0.1/1M.