Side-by-side technical and economic comparison between Anthropic's Claude Opus 5 and OpenAI's OpenAI o1.
• OpenAI o1: Classified as a Legacy Reference model (Generally Available).
| Metric | Claude Opus 5 | OpenAI o1 | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provider Organization | Anthropic | OpenAI | — |
| Standard Input / 1M | $5.00 | $15.00 | Claude Opus 5 (67% lower) |
| Cached Input / 1M | $0.50 | $7.50 | Claude Opus 5 lower |
| Output / 1M | $25.00 | $60.00 | Claude Opus 5 lower |
| Context Window | 1M | 200k | Claude Opus 5 (1M) |
| Max Generation Tokens | 16.4k | 100k | OpenAI o1 |
| Tokenizer Family | Anthropic Claude BPE (~65k vocabulary) | OpenAI o200k_base (200k vocabulary) | — |
Opt for Claude Opus 5 when your engineering requirements prioritize Anthropic's ecosystem, specific tokenizer efficiencies (Calibrated Claude Tokenizer (±3%)), or when your expected prompt-to-completion ratios favor its $5/M input rate.
Opt for OpenAI o1 when looking for OpenAI's tooling integration, specific context window depth (200k tokens), or when output generation volume favors its $60/M rate.