{T}
TokenMath.net
Updated 2026-09-22 11:16 UTC
Head-to-Head Specification Battle

Command R (08-2024) vs GPT-5.6 Mini

Side-by-side technical and economic comparison between Cohere's Command R (08-2024) and OpenAI's GPT-5.6 Mini.

Endpoint Availability & Transition Notice

Command R (08-2024): Classified as a Legacy Reference model (Tracked Production / Legacy Family).

Core Technical & Pricing Comparison
MetricCommand R (08-2024)GPT-5.6 MiniAdvantage
Provider OrganizationCohereOpenAI
Standard Input / 1M$0.15$0.30Command R (08-2024) (50% lower)
Cached Input / 1M$0.015$0.03Command R (08-2024) lower
Output / 1M$0.60$1.20Command R (08-2024) lower
Context Window128k400kGPT-5.6 Mini (400k)
Max Generation Tokens4.1k16.4kGPT-5.6 Mini
Tokenizer FamilyCohere BPE (~256k vocabulary)OpenAI o200k_base (200k vocabulary)

Interactive Side-by-Side Cost Simulator

Live Delta
Input Tokens / Req2,500
Output Tokens / Req800
Daily Requests10,000
Command R (08-2024)LOWER COST
$205.88 / month
$0.00069 / request
GPT-5.6 Mini
$411.75 / month
$0.00137 / request
Selecting Command R (08-2024) saves $205.88 / month (50.0% savings) over GPT-5.6 Mini.

When to Choose Command R (08-2024)

Opt for Command R (08-2024) when your engineering requirements prioritize Cohere's ecosystem, specific tokenizer efficiencies (Calibrated Cohere Tokenizer (±3%)), or when your expected prompt-to-completion ratios favor its $0.15/M input rate.

When to Choose GPT-5.6 Mini

Opt for GPT-5.6 Mini when looking for OpenAI's tooling integration, specific context window depth (400k tokens), or when output generation volume favors its $1.2/M rate.