{T}
TokenMath.net
Updated 2026-09-22 11:16 UTC
Head-to-Head Specification Battle

Command R+ (08-2024) vs Command R (08-2024)

Side-by-side technical and economic comparison between Cohere's Command R+ (08-2024) and Cohere's Command R (08-2024).

Endpoint Availability & Transition Notice

Command R+ (08-2024): Classified as a Legacy Reference model (Tracked Legacy (Predecessor to Command A)).

Command R (08-2024): Classified as a Legacy Reference model (Tracked Production / Legacy Family).

Core Technical & Pricing Comparison
MetricCommand R+ (08-2024)Command R (08-2024)Advantage
Provider OrganizationCohereCohere
Standard Input / 1M$2.50$0.15Command R (08-2024) (94% lower)
Cached Input / 1M$0.25$0.015Command R (08-2024) lower
Output / 1M$10.00$0.60Command R (08-2024) lower
Context Window128k128kEqual
Max Generation Tokens4.1k4.1kCommand R+ (08-2024)
Tokenizer FamilyCohere BPE (~256k vocabulary)Cohere BPE (~256k vocabulary)

Interactive Side-by-Side Cost Simulator

Live Delta
Input Tokens / Req2,500
Output Tokens / Req800
Daily Requests10,000
Command R+ (08-2024)
$3,431.25 / month
$0.0114 / request
Command R (08-2024)LOWER COST
$205.88 / month
$0.00069 / request
Selecting Command R (08-2024) saves $3,225.38 / month (94.0% savings) over Command R+ (08-2024).

When to Choose Command R+ (08-2024)

Opt for Command R+ (08-2024) when your engineering requirements prioritize Cohere's ecosystem, specific tokenizer efficiencies (Calibrated Cohere Tokenizer (±3%)), or when your expected prompt-to-completion ratios favor its $2.5/M input rate.

When to Choose Command R (08-2024)

Opt for Command R (08-2024) when looking for Cohere's tooling integration, specific context window depth (128k tokens), or when output generation volume favors its $0.6/M rate.