{T}
TokenMath.net
Updated 2026-09-22 11:16 UTC
Head-to-Head Specification Battle

Command R+ (08-2024) vs Grok 4.6 Mini

Side-by-side technical and economic comparison between Cohere's Command R+ (08-2024) and xAI's Grok 4.6 Mini.

Endpoint Availability & Transition Notice

Command R+ (08-2024): Classified as a Legacy Reference model (Tracked Legacy (Predecessor to Command A)).

Core Technical & Pricing Comparison
MetricCommand R+ (08-2024)Grok 4.6 MiniAdvantage
Provider OrganizationCoherexAI
Standard Input / 1M$2.50$0.40Grok 4.6 Mini (84% lower)
Cached Input / 1M$0.25$0.10Grok 4.6 Mini lower
Output / 1M$10.00$1.60Grok 4.6 Mini lower
Context Window128k512kGrok 4.6 Mini (512k)
Max Generation Tokens4.1k64kGrok 4.6 Mini
Tokenizer FamilyCohere BPE (~256k vocabulary)OpenAI o200k_base legacy (200k vocabulary)

Interactive Side-by-Side Cost Simulator

Live Delta
Input Tokens / Req2,500
Output Tokens / Req800
Daily Requests10,000
Command R+ (08-2024)
$3,431.25 / month
$0.0114 / request
Grok 4.6 MiniLOWER COST
$571.50 / month
$0.00191 / request
Selecting Grok 4.6 Mini saves $2,859.75 / month (83.3% savings) over Command R+ (08-2024).

When to Choose Command R+ (08-2024)

Opt for Command R+ (08-2024) when your engineering requirements prioritize Cohere's ecosystem, specific tokenizer efficiencies (Calibrated Cohere Tokenizer (±3%)), or when your expected prompt-to-completion ratios favor its $2.5/M input rate.

When to Choose Grok 4.6 Mini

Opt for Grok 4.6 Mini when looking for xAI's tooling integration, specific context window depth (512k tokens), or when output generation volume favors its $1.6/M rate.