{T}
TokenMath.net
Updated 2026-09-22 11:16 UTC
Head-to-Head Specification Battle

Command R+ (08-2024) vs Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI

Side-by-side technical and economic comparison between Cohere's Command R+ (08-2024) and Meta / Together's Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI.

Endpoint Availability & Transition Notice

Command R+ (08-2024): Classified as a Legacy Reference model (Tracked Legacy (Predecessor to Command A)).

Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI: Classified as a Legacy Reference model (Deprecated on Together AI (Reference)).

Core Technical & Pricing Comparison
MetricCommand R+ (08-2024)Llama 3.1 405B — Together AIAdvantage
Provider OrganizationCohereMeta / Together
Standard Input / 1M$2.50$3.50Command R+ (08-2024) (29% lower)
Cached Input / 1M$0.25NoneCommand R+ (08-2024) lower
Output / 1M$10.00$3.50Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI lower
Context Window128k128kLlama 3.1 405B — Together AI (128k)
Max Generation Tokens4.1k4.1kCommand R+ (08-2024)
Tokenizer FamilyCohere BPE (~256k vocabulary)Meta Llama 3 Tiktoken BPE (~128k vocabulary)

Interactive Side-by-Side Cost Simulator

Live Delta
Input Tokens / Req2,500
Output Tokens / Req800
Daily Requests10,000
Command R+ (08-2024)LOWER COST
$3,431.25 / month
$0.0114 / request
Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI
$3,465.00 / month
$0.0116 / request
Selecting Command R+ (08-2024) saves $33.75 / month (1.0% savings) over Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI.

When to Choose Command R+ (08-2024)

Opt for Command R+ (08-2024) when your engineering requirements prioritize Cohere's ecosystem, specific tokenizer efficiencies (Calibrated Cohere Tokenizer (±3%)), or when your expected prompt-to-completion ratios favor its $2.5/M input rate.

When to Choose Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI

Opt for Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI when looking for Meta / Together's tooling integration, specific context window depth (128k tokens), or when output generation volume favors its $3.5/M rate.