{T}
TokenMath.net
Updated 2026-09-22 11:16 UTC
Head-to-Head Specification Battle

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs Grok 2 mini

Side-by-side technical and economic comparison between DeepSeek's DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and xAI's Grok 2 mini.

Endpoint Availability & Transition Notice

Grok 2 mini: Classified as a Legacy Reference model (Generally Available).

Core Technical & Pricing Comparison
MetricDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashGrok 2 miniAdvantage
Provider OrganizationDeepSeekxAI
Standard Input / 1M$0.30$0.20Grok 2 mini (33% lower)
Cached Input / 1M$0.006NoneDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash lower
Output / 1M$1.20$1.00Grok 2 mini lower
Context Window1.05M128kDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash (1.05M)
Max Generation Tokens384k8.2kDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Tokenizer FamilyDeepSeek Byte-Level BPE (100k vocabulary)xAI Byte-level BPE (~131k vocabulary)

Interactive Side-by-Side Cost Simulator

Live Delta
Input Tokens / Req2,500
Output Tokens / Req800
Daily Requests10,000
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
$402.75 / month
$0.00134 / request
Grok 2 miniLOWER COST
$390.00 / month
$0.00130 / request
Selecting Grok 2 mini saves $12.75 / month (3.2% savings) over DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash.

When to Choose DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Opt for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash when your engineering requirements prioritize DeepSeek's ecosystem, specific tokenizer efficiencies (Calibrated DeepSeek Tokenizer (±3%)), or when your expected prompt-to-completion ratios favor its $0.3/M input rate.

When to Choose Grok 2 mini

Opt for Grok 2 mini when looking for xAI's tooling integration, specific context window depth (128k tokens), or when output generation volume favors its $1/M rate.