{T}
TokenMath.net
Updated 2026-09-22 11:16 UTC
Head-to-Head Specification Battle

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI

Side-by-side technical and economic comparison between DeepSeek's DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Meta / Together's Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI.

Endpoint Availability & Transition Notice

Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI: Classified as a Legacy Reference model (Deprecated on Together AI (Reference)).

Core Technical & Pricing Comparison
MetricDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashLlama 3.1 405B — Together AIAdvantage
Provider OrganizationDeepSeekMeta / Together
Standard Input / 1M$0.30$3.50DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash (91% lower)
Cached Input / 1M$0.006NoneDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash lower
Output / 1M$1.20$3.50DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash lower
Context Window1.05M128kDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash (1.05M)
Max Generation Tokens384k4.1kDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Tokenizer FamilyDeepSeek Byte-Level BPE (100k vocabulary)Meta Llama 3 Tiktoken BPE (~128k vocabulary)

Interactive Side-by-Side Cost Simulator

Live Delta
Input Tokens / Req2,500
Output Tokens / Req800
Daily Requests10,000
DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashLOWER COST
$402.75 / month
$0.00134 / request
Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI
$3,465.00 / month
$0.0116 / request
Selecting DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash saves $3,062.25 / month (88.4% savings) over Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI.

When to Choose DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Opt for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash when your engineering requirements prioritize DeepSeek's ecosystem, specific tokenizer efficiencies (Calibrated DeepSeek Tokenizer (±3%)), or when your expected prompt-to-completion ratios favor its $0.3/M input rate.

When to Choose Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI

Opt for Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI when looking for Meta / Together's tooling integration, specific context window depth (128k tokens), or when output generation volume favors its $3.5/M rate.