{T}
TokenMath.net
Updated 2026-09-22 11:16 UTC
Head-to-Head Specification Battle

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI

Side-by-side technical and economic comparison between Google's Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Meta / Together's Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI.

Endpoint Availability & Transition Notice

Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI: Classified as a Legacy Reference model (Deprecated on Together AI (Reference)).

Core Technical & Pricing Comparison
MetricGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewLlama 3.1 405B — Together AIAdvantage
Provider OrganizationGoogleMeta / Together
Standard Input / 1M$2.00$3.50Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (43% lower)
Cached Input / 1M$0.20NoneGemini 3.1 Pro Preview lower
Output / 1M$12.00$3.50Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI lower
Context Window1.05M128kGemini 3.1 Pro Preview (1.05M)
Max Generation Tokens16.4k4.1kGemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Tokenizer FamilyGoogle Gemini SentencePiece (256k vocabulary)Meta Llama 3 Tiktoken BPE (~128k vocabulary)

Interactive Side-by-Side Cost Simulator

Live Delta
Input Tokens / Req2,500
Output Tokens / Req800
Daily Requests10,000
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
$3,705.00 / month
$0.0124 / request
Llama 3.1 405B — Together AILOWER COST
$3,465.00 / month
$0.0116 / request
Selecting Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI saves $240.00 / month (6.5% savings) over Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.

When to Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Opt for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when your engineering requirements prioritize Google's ecosystem, specific tokenizer efficiencies (Calibrated Gemini Tokenizer (±4%)), or when your expected prompt-to-completion ratios favor its $2/M input rate.

When to Choose Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI

Opt for Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI when looking for Meta / Together's tooling integration, specific context window depth (128k tokens), or when output generation volume favors its $3.5/M rate.