{T}
TokenMath.net
Updated 2026-09-22 11:16 UTC
Head-to-Head Specification Battle

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Command R+ (08-2024)

Side-by-side technical and economic comparison between OpenAI's GPT-5.6 Sol and Cohere's Command R+ (08-2024).

Endpoint Availability & Transition Notice

Command R+ (08-2024): Classified as a Legacy Reference model (Tracked Legacy (Predecessor to Command A)).

Core Technical & Pricing Comparison
MetricGPT-5.6 SolCommand R+ (08-2024)Advantage
Provider OrganizationOpenAICohere
Standard Input / 1M$4.00$2.50Command R+ (08-2024) (38% lower)
Cached Input / 1M$0.40$0.25Command R+ (08-2024) lower
Output / 1M$20.00$10.00Command R+ (08-2024) lower
Context Window1.05M128kGPT-5.6 Sol (1.05M)
Max Generation Tokens16.4k4.1kGPT-5.6 Sol
Tokenizer FamilyOpenAI o200k_base (200k vocabulary)Cohere BPE (~256k vocabulary)

Interactive Side-by-Side Cost Simulator

Live Delta
Input Tokens / Req2,500
Output Tokens / Req800
Daily Requests10,000
GPT-5.6 Sol
$6,450.00 / month
$0.0215 / request
Command R+ (08-2024)LOWER COST
$3,431.25 / month
$0.0114 / request
Selecting Command R+ (08-2024) saves $3,018.75 / month (46.8% savings) over GPT-5.6 Sol.

When to Choose GPT-5.6 Sol

Opt for GPT-5.6 Sol when your engineering requirements prioritize OpenAI's ecosystem, specific tokenizer efficiencies (Exact BPE (o200k_base)), or when your expected prompt-to-completion ratios favor its $4/M input rate.

When to Choose Command R+ (08-2024)

Opt for Command R+ (08-2024) when looking for Cohere's tooling integration, specific context window depth (128k tokens), or when output generation volume favors its $10/M rate.