{T}
TokenMath.net
Updated 2026-09-22 11:16 UTC
Head-to-Head Specification Battle

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI

Side-by-side technical and economic comparison between OpenAI's GPT-5.6 Sol and Meta / Together's Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI.

Endpoint Availability & Transition Notice

Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI: Classified as a Legacy Reference model (Deprecated on Together AI (Reference)).

Core Technical & Pricing Comparison
MetricGPT-5.6 SolLlama 3.1 405B — Together AIAdvantage
Provider OrganizationOpenAIMeta / Together
Standard Input / 1M$4.00$3.50Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI (13% lower)
Cached Input / 1M$0.40NoneGPT-5.6 Sol lower
Output / 1M$20.00$3.50Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI lower
Context Window1.05M128kGPT-5.6 Sol (1.05M)
Max Generation Tokens16.4k4.1kGPT-5.6 Sol
Tokenizer FamilyOpenAI o200k_base (200k vocabulary)Meta Llama 3 Tiktoken BPE (~128k vocabulary)

Interactive Side-by-Side Cost Simulator

Live Delta
Input Tokens / Req2,500
Output Tokens / Req800
Daily Requests10,000
GPT-5.6 Sol
$6,450.00 / month
$0.0215 / request
Llama 3.1 405B — Together AILOWER COST
$3,465.00 / month
$0.0116 / request
Selecting Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI saves $2,985.00 / month (46.3% savings) over GPT-5.6 Sol.

When to Choose GPT-5.6 Sol

Opt for GPT-5.6 Sol when your engineering requirements prioritize OpenAI's ecosystem, specific tokenizer efficiencies (Exact BPE (o200k_base)), or when your expected prompt-to-completion ratios favor its $4/M input rate.

When to Choose Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI

Opt for Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI when looking for Meta / Together's tooling integration, specific context window depth (128k tokens), or when output generation volume favors its $3.5/M rate.