{T}
TokenMath.net
Updated 2026-09-22 11:16 UTC
Head-to-Head Specification Battle

GPT-5.6 Terra vs Command R (08-2024)

Side-by-side technical and economic comparison between OpenAI's GPT-5.6 Terra and Cohere's Command R (08-2024).

Endpoint Availability & Transition Notice

Command R (08-2024): Classified as a Legacy Reference model (Tracked Production / Legacy Family).

Core Technical & Pricing Comparison
MetricGPT-5.6 TerraCommand R (08-2024)Advantage
Provider OrganizationOpenAICohere
Standard Input / 1M$2.00$0.15Command R (08-2024) (93% lower)
Cached Input / 1M$0.20$0.015Command R (08-2024) lower
Output / 1M$12.00$0.60Command R (08-2024) lower
Context Window1.05M128kGPT-5.6 Terra (1.05M)
Max Generation Tokens16.4k4.1kGPT-5.6 Terra
Tokenizer FamilyOpenAI o200k_base (200k vocabulary)Cohere BPE (~256k vocabulary)

Interactive Side-by-Side Cost Simulator

Live Delta
Input Tokens / Req2,500
Output Tokens / Req800
Daily Requests10,000
GPT-5.6 Terra
$3,705.00 / month
$0.0124 / request
Command R (08-2024)LOWER COST
$205.88 / month
$0.00069 / request
Selecting Command R (08-2024) saves $3,499.13 / month (94.4% savings) over GPT-5.6 Terra.

When to Choose GPT-5.6 Terra

Opt for GPT-5.6 Terra when your engineering requirements prioritize OpenAI's ecosystem, specific tokenizer efficiencies (Exact BPE (o200k_base)), or when your expected prompt-to-completion ratios favor its $2/M input rate.

When to Choose Command R (08-2024)

Opt for Command R (08-2024) when looking for Cohere's tooling integration, specific context window depth (128k tokens), or when output generation volume favors its $0.6/M rate.