{T}
TokenMath.net
Updated 2026-09-22 11:16 UTC
Head-to-Head Specification Battle

GPT-6 Astra vs Command A

Side-by-side technical and economic comparison between OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra and Cohere's Command A.

Core Technical & Pricing Comparison
MetricGPT-6 AstraCommand AAdvantage
Provider OrganizationOpenAICohere
Standard Input / 1M$10.00$2.00Command A (80% lower)
Cached Input / 1M$1.00$0.20Command A lower
Output / 1M$50.00$8.00Command A lower
Context Window1.05M256kGPT-6 Astra (1.05M)
Max Generation Tokens32k64kCommand A
Tokenizer FamilyOpenAI o200k_base (200k vocabulary)Cohere Byte-Pair Encoding (256k vocabulary)

Interactive Side-by-Side Cost Simulator

Live Delta
Input Tokens / Req2,500
Output Tokens / Req800
Daily Requests10,000
GPT-6 Astra
$16,125.00 / month
$0.0538 / request
Command ALOWER COST
$2,745.00 / month
$0.00915 / request
Selecting Command A saves $13,380.00 / month (83.0% savings) over GPT-6 Astra.

When to Choose GPT-6 Astra

Opt for GPT-6 Astra when your engineering requirements prioritize OpenAI's ecosystem, specific tokenizer efficiencies (Exact BPE (o200k_base)), or when your expected prompt-to-completion ratios favor its $10/M input rate.

When to Choose Command A

Opt for Command A when looking for Cohere's tooling integration, specific context window depth (256k tokens), or when output generation volume favors its $8/M rate.