{T}
TokenMath.net
Updated 2026-09-22 11:16 UTC
Head-to-Head Specification Battle

GPT-6 Astra vs Command R (08-2024)

Side-by-side technical and economic comparison between OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra and Cohere's Command R (08-2024).

Endpoint Availability & Transition Notice

Command R (08-2024): Classified as a Legacy Reference model (Tracked Production / Legacy Family).

Core Technical & Pricing Comparison
MetricGPT-6 AstraCommand R (08-2024)Advantage
Provider OrganizationOpenAICohere
Standard Input / 1M$10.00$0.15Command R (08-2024) (99% lower)
Cached Input / 1M$1.00$0.015Command R (08-2024) lower
Output / 1M$50.00$0.60Command R (08-2024) lower
Context Window1.05M128kGPT-6 Astra (1.05M)
Max Generation Tokens32k4.1kGPT-6 Astra
Tokenizer FamilyOpenAI o200k_base (200k vocabulary)Cohere BPE (~256k vocabulary)

Interactive Side-by-Side Cost Simulator

Live Delta
Input Tokens / Req2,500
Output Tokens / Req800
Daily Requests10,000
GPT-6 Astra
$16,125.00 / month
$0.0538 / request
Command R (08-2024)LOWER COST
$205.88 / month
$0.00069 / request
Selecting Command R (08-2024) saves $15,919.13 / month (98.7% savings) over GPT-6 Astra.

When to Choose GPT-6 Astra

Opt for GPT-6 Astra when your engineering requirements prioritize OpenAI's ecosystem, specific tokenizer efficiencies (Exact BPE (o200k_base)), or when your expected prompt-to-completion ratios favor its $10/M input rate.

When to Choose Command R (08-2024)

Opt for Command R (08-2024) when looking for Cohere's tooling integration, specific context window depth (128k tokens), or when output generation volume favors its $0.6/M rate.