{T}
TokenMath.net
Updated 2026-09-22 11:16 UTC
Head-to-Head Specification Battle

Grok 2 mini vs Command R (08-2024)

Side-by-side technical and economic comparison between xAI's Grok 2 mini and Cohere's Command R (08-2024).

Endpoint Availability & Transition Notice

Grok 2 mini: Classified as a Legacy Reference model (Generally Available).

Command R (08-2024): Classified as a Legacy Reference model (Tracked Production / Legacy Family).

Core Technical & Pricing Comparison
MetricGrok 2 miniCommand R (08-2024)Advantage
Provider OrganizationxAICohere
Standard Input / 1M$0.20$0.15Command R (08-2024) (25% lower)
Cached Input / 1MNone$0.015Command R (08-2024) lower
Output / 1M$1.00$0.60Command R (08-2024) lower
Context Window128k128kGrok 2 mini (128k)
Max Generation Tokens8.2k4.1kGrok 2 mini
Tokenizer FamilyxAI Byte-level BPE (~131k vocabulary)Cohere BPE (~256k vocabulary)

Interactive Side-by-Side Cost Simulator

Live Delta
Input Tokens / Req2,500
Output Tokens / Req800
Daily Requests10,000
Grok 2 mini
$390.00 / month
$0.00130 / request
Command R (08-2024)LOWER COST
$205.88 / month
$0.00069 / request
Selecting Command R (08-2024) saves $184.13 / month (47.2% savings) over Grok 2 mini.

When to Choose Grok 2 mini

Opt for Grok 2 mini when your engineering requirements prioritize xAI's ecosystem, specific tokenizer efficiencies (Calibrated xAI Tokenizer (±3%)), or when your expected prompt-to-completion ratios favor its $0.2/M input rate.

When to Choose Command R (08-2024)

Opt for Command R (08-2024) when looking for Cohere's tooling integration, specific context window depth (128k tokens), or when output generation volume favors its $0.6/M rate.