{T}
TokenMath.net
Updated 2026-09-22 11:16 UTC
Head-to-Head Specification Battle

Grok 2 mini vs Command R+ (08-2024)

Side-by-side technical and economic comparison between xAI's Grok 2 mini and Cohere's Command R+ (08-2024).

Endpoint Availability & Transition Notice

Grok 2 mini: Classified as a Legacy Reference model (Generally Available).

Command R+ (08-2024): Classified as a Legacy Reference model (Tracked Legacy (Predecessor to Command A)).

Core Technical & Pricing Comparison
MetricGrok 2 miniCommand R+ (08-2024)Advantage
Provider OrganizationxAICohere
Standard Input / 1M$0.20$2.50Grok 2 mini (92% lower)
Cached Input / 1MNone$0.25Grok 2 mini lower
Output / 1M$1.00$10.00Grok 2 mini lower
Context Window128k128kGrok 2 mini (128k)
Max Generation Tokens8.2k4.1kGrok 2 mini
Tokenizer FamilyxAI Byte-level BPE (~131k vocabulary)Cohere BPE (~256k vocabulary)

Interactive Side-by-Side Cost Simulator

Live Delta
Input Tokens / Req2,500
Output Tokens / Req800
Daily Requests10,000
Grok 2 miniLOWER COST
$390.00 / month
$0.00130 / request
Command R+ (08-2024)
$3,431.25 / month
$0.0114 / request
Selecting Grok 2 mini saves $3,041.25 / month (88.6% savings) over Command R+ (08-2024).

When to Choose Grok 2 mini

Opt for Grok 2 mini when your engineering requirements prioritize xAI's ecosystem, specific tokenizer efficiencies (Calibrated xAI Tokenizer (±3%)), or when your expected prompt-to-completion ratios favor its $0.2/M input rate.

When to Choose Command R+ (08-2024)

Opt for Command R+ (08-2024) when looking for Cohere's tooling integration, specific context window depth (128k tokens), or when output generation volume favors its $10/M rate.