{T}
TokenMath.net
Updated 2026-09-22 11:16 UTC
Head-to-Head Specification Battle

Grok 2 mini vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Reasoner

Side-by-side technical and economic comparison between xAI's Grok 2 mini and DeepSeek's DeepSeek-V4.1-Reasoner.

Endpoint Availability & Transition Notice

Grok 2 mini: Classified as a Legacy Reference model (Generally Available).

Core Technical & Pricing Comparison
MetricGrok 2 miniDeepSeek-V4.1-ReasonerAdvantage
Provider OrganizationxAIDeepSeek
Standard Input / 1M$0.20$0.50Grok 2 mini (60% lower)
Cached Input / 1MNone$0.01DeepSeek-V4.1-Reasoner lower
Output / 1M$1.00$2.50Grok 2 mini lower
Context Window128k256kDeepSeek-V4.1-Reasoner (256k)
Max Generation Tokens8.2k384kDeepSeek-V4.1-Reasoner
Tokenizer FamilyxAI Byte-level BPE (~131k vocabulary)DeepSeek Byte-Level BPE (102k vocabulary)

Interactive Side-by-Side Cost Simulator

Live Delta
Input Tokens / Req2,500
Output Tokens / Req800
Daily Requests10,000
Grok 2 miniLOWER COST
$390.00 / month
$0.00130 / request
DeepSeek-V4.1-Reasoner
$791.25 / month
$0.00264 / request
Selecting Grok 2 mini saves $401.25 / month (50.7% savings) over DeepSeek-V4.1-Reasoner.

When to Choose Grok 2 mini

Opt for Grok 2 mini when your engineering requirements prioritize xAI's ecosystem, specific tokenizer efficiencies (Calibrated xAI Tokenizer (±3%)), or when your expected prompt-to-completion ratios favor its $0.2/M input rate.

When to Choose DeepSeek-V4.1-Reasoner

Opt for DeepSeek-V4.1-Reasoner when looking for DeepSeek's tooling integration, specific context window depth (256k tokens), or when output generation volume favors its $2.5/M rate.