{T}
TokenMath.net
Updated 2026-09-22 11:16 UTC
Head-to-Head Specification Battle

Grok 2 vs Qwen3 235B-A22B

Side-by-side technical and economic comparison between xAI's Grok 2 and Alibaba / Qwen's Qwen3 235B-A22B.

Endpoint Availability & Transition Notice

Grok 2: Classified as a Legacy Reference model (Generally Available).

Core Technical & Pricing Comparison
MetricGrok 2Qwen3 235B-A22BAdvantage
Provider OrganizationxAIAlibaba / Qwen
Standard Input / 1M$2.00$0.90Qwen3 235B-A22B (55% lower)
Cached Input / 1MNone$0.18Qwen3 235B-A22B lower
Output / 1M$10.00$1.60Qwen3 235B-A22B lower
Context Window128k128kEqual
Max Generation Tokens8.2k32kQwen3 235B-A22B
Tokenizer FamilyxAI Byte-level BPE (~131k vocabulary)Qwen SentencePiece BPE (152k vocabulary)

Interactive Side-by-Side Cost Simulator

Live Delta
Input Tokens / Req2,500
Output Tokens / Req800
Daily Requests10,000
Grok 2
$3,900.00 / month
$0.0130 / request
Qwen3 235B-A22BLOWER COST
$789.00 / month
$0.00263 / request
Selecting Qwen3 235B-A22B saves $3,111.00 / month (79.8% savings) over Grok 2.

When to Choose Grok 2

Opt for Grok 2 when your engineering requirements prioritize xAI's ecosystem, specific tokenizer efficiencies (Calibrated xAI Tokenizer (±3%)), or when your expected prompt-to-completion ratios favor its $2/M input rate.

When to Choose Qwen3 235B-A22B

Opt for Qwen3 235B-A22B when looking for Alibaba / Qwen's tooling integration, specific context window depth (128k tokens), or when output generation volume favors its $1.6/M rate.