{T}
TokenMath.net
Updated 2026-09-22 11:16 UTC
Head-to-Head Specification Battle

Grok 4.6 vs Command R+ (08-2024)

Side-by-side technical and economic comparison between xAI's Grok 4.6 and Cohere's Command R+ (08-2024).

Endpoint Availability & Transition Notice

Command R+ (08-2024): Classified as a Legacy Reference model (Tracked Legacy (Predecessor to Command A)).

Core Technical & Pricing Comparison
MetricGrok 4.6Command R+ (08-2024)Advantage
Provider OrganizationxAICohere
Standard Input / 1M$2.00$2.50Grok 4.6 (20% lower)
Cached Input / 1M$0.50$0.25Command R+ (08-2024) lower
Output / 1M$6.00$10.00Grok 4.6 lower
Context Window500k128kGrok 4.6 (500k)
Max Generation Tokens128k4.1kGrok 4.6
Tokenizer FamilyxAI Byte-level BPE (~131k vocabulary)Cohere BPE (~256k vocabulary)

Interactive Side-by-Side Cost Simulator

Live Delta
Input Tokens / Req2,500
Output Tokens / Req800
Daily Requests10,000
Grok 4.6LOWER COST
$2,377.50 / month
$0.00793 / request
Command R+ (08-2024)
$3,431.25 / month
$0.0114 / request
Selecting Grok 4.6 saves $1,053.75 / month (30.7% savings) over Command R+ (08-2024).

When to Choose Grok 4.6

Opt for Grok 4.6 when your engineering requirements prioritize xAI's ecosystem, specific tokenizer efficiencies (Calibrated xAI Tokenizer (±3%)), or when your expected prompt-to-completion ratios favor its $2/M input rate.

When to Choose Command R+ (08-2024)

Opt for Command R+ (08-2024) when looking for Cohere's tooling integration, specific context window depth (128k tokens), or when output generation volume favors its $10/M rate.