{T}
TokenMath.net
Updated 2026-09-22 11:16 UTC
Head-to-Head Specification Battle

Grok 4.6 vs Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI

Side-by-side technical and economic comparison between xAI's Grok 4.6 and Meta / Together's Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI.

Endpoint Availability & Transition Notice

Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI: Classified as a Legacy Reference model (Deprecated on Together AI (Reference)).

Core Technical & Pricing Comparison
MetricGrok 4.6Llama 3.1 405B — Together AIAdvantage
Provider OrganizationxAIMeta / Together
Standard Input / 1M$2.00$3.50Grok 4.6 (43% lower)
Cached Input / 1M$0.50NoneGrok 4.6 lower
Output / 1M$6.00$3.50Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI lower
Context Window500k128kGrok 4.6 (500k)
Max Generation Tokens128k4.1kGrok 4.6
Tokenizer FamilyxAI Byte-level BPE (~131k vocabulary)Meta Llama 3 Tiktoken BPE (~128k vocabulary)

Interactive Side-by-Side Cost Simulator

Live Delta
Input Tokens / Req2,500
Output Tokens / Req800
Daily Requests10,000
Grok 4.6LOWER COST
$2,377.50 / month
$0.00793 / request
Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI
$3,465.00 / month
$0.0116 / request
Selecting Grok 4.6 saves $1,087.50 / month (31.4% savings) over Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI.

When to Choose Grok 4.6

Opt for Grok 4.6 when your engineering requirements prioritize xAI's ecosystem, specific tokenizer efficiencies (Calibrated xAI Tokenizer (±3%)), or when your expected prompt-to-completion ratios favor its $2/M input rate.

When to Choose Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI

Opt for Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI when looking for Meta / Together's tooling integration, specific context window depth (128k tokens), or when output generation volume favors its $3.5/M rate.