Claude Sonnet 5 vs Llama 4 Scout (17B Active / 109B MoE) — Together AI

Side-by-side technical and economic comparison between Anthropic's Claude Sonnet 5 and Meta / Together's Llama 4 Scout (17B Active / 109B MoE) — Together AI.

Verdict: Llama 4 Scout (17B Active / 109B MoE) — Together AI is about 93% cheaper than Claude Sonnet 5 at a typical 3:1 input-to-output mix ($0.282 vs $4.00 per 1M blended tokens). Claude Sonnet 5 offers the larger context window (1M tokens).

Endpoint Availability & Transition Notice

• Llama 4 Scout (17B Active / 109B MoE) — Together AI: Classified as a Legacy Reference model (Deprecated on Together AI (Reference)).

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Llama 4 Scout (17B Active / 109B MoE) — Together AI Pricing & Specs

Metric	Claude Sonnet 5	Llama 4 Scout (17B Active / 109B MoE) — Together AI	Advantage
Provider Organization	Anthropic	Meta / Together	—
Standard Input / 1M	$2.00	$0.18	Llama 4 Scout (17B Active / 109B MoE) — Together AI (91% lower)
Cached Input / 1M	$0.20	None	Llama 4 Scout (17B Active / 109B MoE) — Together AI lower
Output / 1M	$10.00	$0.59	Llama 4 Scout (17B Active / 109B MoE) — Together AI lower
Context Window	1M	328k	Claude Sonnet 5 (1M)
Max Generation Tokens	16.4k	16.4k	Claude Sonnet 5
Tokenizer Family	Anthropic Claude BPE (~65k vocabulary)	Meta Llama 3/4 Tiktoken (128k vocabulary)	—

Monthly Cost: Claude Sonnet 5 vs Llama 4 Scout (17B Active / 109B MoE) — Together AI

Workload (per month)	Claude Sonnet 5	Llama 4 Scout (17B Active / 109B MoE) — Together AI
Chatbot10k requests · 500 in / 200 out	$30.00	$2.08
RAG app100k requests · 8,000 in / 1,200 out	$2,800.00	$214.80
Coding agent100k requests · 12,000 in / 2,000 out	$4,400.00	$334.00

Standard rates, no caching or batch discounts. Model your own numbers below.

Interactive Side-by-Side Cost Simulator

Live Delta

Input Tokens / Req2,500

Output Tokens / Req800

Daily Requests10,000

Claude Sonnet 5

$3,225.00 / month

$0.0108 / request

Llama 4 Scout (17B Active / 109B MoE) — Together AILOWER COST

$276.60 / month

$0.00092 / request

Selecting Llama 4 Scout (17B Active / 109B MoE) — Together AI saves $2,948.40 / month (91.4% savings) over Claude Sonnet 5.

When to Choose Claude Sonnet 5

Opt for Claude Sonnet 5 when your engineering requirements prioritize Anthropic's ecosystem, specific tokenizer efficiencies (Calibrated Claude Tokenizer (±3%)), or when your expected prompt-to-completion ratios favor its $2/M input rate.

Claude Sonnet 5 Specs & Documentation

When to Choose Llama 4 Scout (17B Active / 109B MoE) — Together AI

Opt for Llama 4 Scout (17B Active / 109B MoE) — Together AI when looking for Meta / Together's tooling integration, specific context window depth (328k tokens), or when output generation volume favors its $0.59/M rate.

Llama 4 Scout (17B Active / 109B MoE) — Together AI Specs & Documentation

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Llama 4 Scout (17B Active / 109B MoE) — Together AI FAQ

Is Claude Sonnet 5 cheaper than Llama 4 Scout (17B Active / 109B MoE) — Together AI?

At a typical 3:1 input-to-output token mix, Llama 4 Scout (17B Active / 109B MoE) — Together AI is about 93% cheaper than Claude Sonnet 5. Claude Sonnet 5 costs $2 per 1M input and $10 per 1M output tokens; Llama 4 Scout (17B Active / 109B MoE) — Together AI costs $0.18 and $0.59.

Which has a larger context window, Claude Sonnet 5 or Llama 4 Scout (17B Active / 109B MoE) — Together AI?

Claude Sonnet 5 has the larger context window: 1M tokens vs 328k.

Do Claude Sonnet 5 and Llama 4 Scout (17B Active / 109B MoE) — Together AI support prompt caching?

Claude Sonnet 5: yes, cached input costs $0.2/1M. Llama 4 Scout (17B Active / 109B MoE) — Together AI: no standard prompt caching discount.