Side-by-side technical and economic comparison between Meta / Together's Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI and Cohere's Command A.
• Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI: Classified as a Legacy Reference model (Deprecated on Together AI (Reference)).
| Metric | Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI | Command A | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provider Organization | Meta / Together | Cohere | — |
| Standard Input / 1M | $3.50 | $2.00 | Command A (43% lower) |
| Cached Input / 1M | None | $0.20 | Command A lower |
| Output / 1M | $3.50 | $8.00 | Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI lower |
| Context Window | 128k | 256k | Command A (256k) |
| Max Generation Tokens | 4.1k | 64k | Command A |
| Tokenizer Family | Meta Llama 3 Tiktoken BPE (~128k vocabulary) | Cohere Byte-Pair Encoding (256k vocabulary) | — |
Opt for Llama 3.1 405B — Together AI when your engineering requirements prioritize Meta / Together's ecosystem, specific tokenizer efficiencies (Exact Llama 3 Tokenizer (±2%)), or when your expected prompt-to-completion ratios favor its $3.5/M input rate.
Opt for Command A when looking for Cohere's tooling integration, specific context window depth (256k tokens), or when output generation volume favors its $8/M rate.