{T}
TokenMath.net
Updated 2026-09-22 11:16 UTC
Head-to-Head Specification Battle

OpenAI o3 vs Command R+ (08-2024)

Side-by-side technical and economic comparison between OpenAI's OpenAI o3 and Cohere's Command R+ (08-2024).

Endpoint Availability & Transition Notice

Command R+ (08-2024): Classified as a Legacy Reference model (Tracked Legacy (Predecessor to Command A)).

Core Technical & Pricing Comparison
MetricOpenAI o3Command R+ (08-2024)Advantage
Provider OrganizationOpenAICohere
Standard Input / 1M$2.00$2.50OpenAI o3 (20% lower)
Cached Input / 1M$0.50$0.25Command R+ (08-2024) lower
Output / 1M$8.00$10.00OpenAI o3 lower
Context Window200k128kOpenAI o3 (200k)
Max Generation Tokens100k4.1kOpenAI o3
Tokenizer FamilyOpenAI o200k_base (200k vocabulary)Cohere BPE (~256k vocabulary)

Interactive Side-by-Side Cost Simulator

Live Delta
Input Tokens / Req2,500
Output Tokens / Req800
Daily Requests10,000
OpenAI o3LOWER COST
$2,857.50 / month
$0.00953 / request
Command R+ (08-2024)
$3,431.25 / month
$0.0114 / request
Selecting OpenAI o3 saves $573.75 / month (16.7% savings) over Command R+ (08-2024).

When to Choose OpenAI o3

Opt for OpenAI o3 when your engineering requirements prioritize OpenAI's ecosystem, specific tokenizer efficiencies (Exact BPE (o200k_base)), or when your expected prompt-to-completion ratios favor its $2/M input rate.

When to Choose Command R+ (08-2024)

Opt for Command R+ (08-2024) when looking for Cohere's tooling integration, specific context window depth (128k tokens), or when output generation volume favors its $10/M rate.