Side-by-side technical and economic comparison between OpenAI's OpenAI o1 and xAI's Grok 4.6 Mini.
• OpenAI o1: Classified as a Legacy Reference model (Generally Available).
| Metric | OpenAI o1 | Grok 4.6 Mini | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provider Organization | OpenAI | xAI | — |
| Standard Input / 1M | $15.00 | $0.40 | Grok 4.6 Mini (97% lower) |
| Cached Input / 1M | $7.50 | $0.10 | Grok 4.6 Mini lower |
| Output / 1M | $60.00 | $1.60 | Grok 4.6 Mini lower |
| Context Window | 200k | 512k | Grok 4.6 Mini (512k) |
| Max Generation Tokens | 100k | 64k | OpenAI o1 |
| Tokenizer Family | OpenAI o200k_base (200k vocabulary) | OpenAI o200k_base legacy (200k vocabulary) | — |
Opt for OpenAI o1 when your engineering requirements prioritize OpenAI's ecosystem, specific tokenizer efficiencies (Exact BPE (o200k_base)), or when your expected prompt-to-completion ratios favor its $15/M input rate.
Opt for Grok 4.6 Mini when looking for xAI's tooling integration, specific context window depth (512k tokens), or when output generation volume favors its $1.6/M rate.